The council has cleared about £1.3m of demolition contracts for Bletchley's Brunel Centre and the old Wilko. Soft strip starts November, site clear by May 2027.

Milton Keynes City Council has approved the start of procurement for the demolition of the Brunel Centre in Bletchley and the former Wilko building next to it, at a combined cost of around £1.3 million.

The decision was taken at the council’s Delegated Decisions meeting on 1 September and published the next day. It is decision reference 2139, brought by Ed Hume, the cabinet member for housing and the Bletchley Town Deal, and it is recorded as not subject to call-in.

The approval covers three separate strands of work, which the council can now put out to tender under an existing framework:

  • demolition contractors
  • soft strip contractors, who take out fixtures and fittings before the building comes down
  • licensed asbestos removal contractors

The council estimates each individual contract will be worth less than £1 million, with the three adding up to about £1.3 million. Authority to award them has been delegated to the Director of Environment and Property.

Nothing stands in the way of the diggers

The report is unusually blunt about how few obstacles are left. Prior approval for demolition has already been granted for both the Brunel Centre and the former Wilko building. The officers write that this means there are “no planning constraints preventing immediate progression of demolition works”.

The former Wilko unit is fully vacant. The main Brunel Centre is described as “approaching vacant possession”, with one tenant’s lease running beyond 2026. That single lease is why the council has chosen to split the job rather than let one contract: it can start knocking down the empty parts while the last tenant sits tight.

Officers set out four reasons for going now rather than waiting. Vacant buildings attract trespass, vandalism and antisocial behaviour. They carry security and compliance costs. They leave the council exposed under the Occupiers’ Liability Acts of 1957 and 1984. And an empty building still generates a business rates bill, which demolition ends.

Who pays

None of it falls on the council’s own budget. The report states that the whole cost will be met by the Revolving Development Fund of the Bletchley Towns Deal, and that phasing the work will ensure there is no shortfall, so “no funding will be required from MKCC”.

There is one caveat in the financial section worth holding on to. The £1.3 million budget is judged sufficient “subject to no significant unforeseen asbestos discovery”. A 1970s-era shopping centre is exactly where that risk sits, and the council has separated the asbestos contract partly to keep control of it.

The timetable

Brunel Centre demolition: the council's own timetable Approved at Delegated Decisions, 1 September 2026 Sep 2026 Launch procurement Oct 2026 Appoint contractors Nov 2026 Soft strip, asbestos removal, first demolition Feb 2027 Remainder of demolition May 2027 Project completion Source: Milton Keynes City Council, "Towns Deal Bletchley: Procurement of Demolition Works", Delegated Decisions, 1 September 2026. Graphic by MK Daily
The demolition programme as set out in the council's own report. Graphic by MK Daily.

The report’s implementation timetable runs:

  • September 2026: launch the procurement process
  • October 2026: appoint contractors
  • November 2026: begin soft strip out, asbestos removal and initial demolition where feasible
  • February 2027: begin the remainder of the demolition
  • May 2027: project completion

How this fits the Town Deal

The Brunel Centre sits inside the Bletchley and Fenny Stratford Town Deal programme, in the Bletchley Park and Fenny Stratford ward. The council’s own plan commits it to “revitalisation of central Bletchley town centre”, which also covers the Queensway improvement scheme, a new eastern entrance to Bletchley railway station, and the Bletchley Investment Taskforce.

The intention to demolish is not new. A delegated decision in July 2024 approved the procurement of a development partner and confirmed that the Brunel Centre would come down. What happened on 1 September was the step that turns that intention into contracts.

Officers considered doing nothing, which they rejected because of holding costs and delay, and considered letting a single contract, which they rejected because it would hold up early demolition and expose the council to asbestos cost risk. The phased approach was the recommended option.

What we could not establish

The report does not say what will replace the Brunel Centre, and it does not name a development partner. It also gives no figure for how many units are still trading in the centre, nor when the remaining lease expires beyond “beyond 2026”. Those are the questions we will keep asking.

What it means for you

  • If you shop in the Brunel Centre, expect hoardings and closures from November, starting with the empty parts of the site.
  • If you trade there, the council has not published which units are affected first. The report says only that vacant possession of the main centre is “being obtained”.
  • If you live nearby, licensed asbestos removal is scheduled for November onwards. That work is separately regulated and the contractor must notify the Health and Safety Executive before starting.
  • The money is ring-fenced. This comes out of the Bletchley Towns Deal fund, not general council spending, so it does not compete with services.
  • The site should be clear by May 2027 on the council’s own programme, which is before anything is built on it.

Anyone wanting to follow the paper trail can read the decisions register on the council’s own site. We also track applications and appeals across the district on our Milton Keynes planning news page, and the Queensway works on our roadworks and travel page.

Sources